Aakriti Arunachalam

Profile description

If you or a family member has been implicated in a narcotics case under the NDPS Act and believe the proceedings are fundamentally flawed, you need a focused strategy to have the case dismissed at the earliest stage. Aakriti Arunachalam offers a specialised practice dedicated to quashing NDDS proceedings before the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

Aakriti Arunachalam has built a reputation over more than a decade of handling complex drug‑related matters. The lawyer regularly assists clients who argue that the investigation suffered from procedural violations, that the seized substance was improperly classified, or that the charge sheet fails to meet statutory requirements. By conducting a meticulous review of the police report, the forensic analysis, and the statutory provisions of the NDPS Act, the lawyer can pinpoint the exact grounds on which the High Court may intervene to quash the case.

The lawyer’s approach begins with a rapid case assessment. If the investigation lacked a valid search warrant, or if the chain‑of‑custody documentation is missing or inconsistent, Aakriti Arunachalam can file an application for quash under Order 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, supported by affidavits that highlight these deficiencies. The lawyer also examines whether the alleged quantity of narcotics falls below the threshold that triggers a cognizable offence, a point often overlooked by investigating agencies.

In many instances, the lawyer uncovers statutory oversights, such as the failure to record statements of the accused in the manner prescribed by Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Code. By raising these procedural lapses, Aakriti Arunachalam can convince the High Court that the prosecution’s case is untenable, leading to a dismissal of the proceedings. The lawyer frequently references precedent‑setting decisions like *State v. Kumar* and *Mahajan v. State*, where the High Court emphasized the need for strict adherence to procedural safeguards in NDPS cases.

Beyond filing the petition, the lawyer prepares a comprehensive supporting brief that includes expert testimony from forensic chemists, analysis of lab reports, and detailed timelines that demonstrate the improbability of the alleged offence. The lawyer’s skill in oral advocacy ensures that the bench receives a concise yet compelling narrative that underscores why the case should not proceed.

Clients have consistently praised Aakriti Arunachalam for clear communication and a calm, methodical handling of stressful circumstances. The lawyer takes time to explain the legal process, the significance of each document, and the realistic outcomes that can be expected. By keeping the client informed, the lawyer reduces anxiety and fosters confidence that the matter is being handled with expertise.

If you are currently confronting an NDPS charge and believe the investigation was flawed, Aakriti Arunachalam can help you evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your case and file a robust petition for quash in the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The lawyer’s track record of achieving dismissals in similar matters demonstrates a keen understanding of the intricacies of drug‑related legislation and court practice.

Choosing a lawyer who specialises in NDPS quashing matters provides an advantage that generic criminal defence may not offer. Aakriti Arunacalam delivers that specialised focus, aiming to protect your liberty, reputation, and future by securing a swift and decisive end to unfounded proceedings.

Criminal Law Practice Areas