Aaqib Patil

Profile description

When a Punjab and Haryana High Court decision unexpectedly nullifies a criminal proceeding, many clients feel the verdict leaves them vulnerable to future prosecution. Aaqib Patil, a seasoned advocate based in Chandigarh, handles Special Leave Petitions that challenge such quashing orders before the Supreme Court of India. The advocate’s focus is to protect clients from re‑opening of cases that have already been dismissed.

Patil earned a Bachelor of Laws from Delhi University and later completed a Master of Laws with a concentration on constitutional criminal procedure. Over twelve years of practice, the advocate has filed more than fifty Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) and Supreme Court review petitions, achieving reversal of unjust quashings in a majority of cases. Patil’s reputation rests on meticulous research, persuasive drafting, and confident oral advocacy before the nation’s apex court.

The core of Patil’s work involves scrutinising the reasoning of the High Court’s quashing order. The advocate identifies errors of law, misinterpretation of evidence, or procedural oversights that can be raised in an SLP. By presenting a concise yet comprehensive argument, Patil can convince the Supreme Court that the lower court’s decision warrants reconsideration. The advocate regularly assists clients in preparing affidavits, annexures, and statutory citations that strengthen the petition.

If the Supreme Court grants leave, Patil moves the matter to a full review petition. In this phase, the advocate expands on the legal deficiencies identified earlier, supplements the record with fresh material, and cites recent Supreme Court judgments that support the restoration of the original proceedings. Patil’s familiarity with the Supreme Court’s scheduling and bench composition enables strategic filing that maximises the chance of a favourable order.

During the initial consultation, Patil explains the likely timeline, the costs involved, and the realistic expectations for each stage. The advocate adopts a transparent fee structure that reflects the complexity of Supreme Court practice, and no surprise expenses appear after filing. Patil also provides regular updates on the status of the petition, ensuring that clients are never left in the dark while the Supreme Court deliberates.

Patil also conducts mock arguments to prepare clients for any oral clarification the bench may request. This proactive approach reduces surprise during hearings and demonstrates the advocate’s commitment to thorough representation. By anticipating questions on jurisdiction, evidentiary standards, and constitutional safeguards, Patil ensures that the petition is compelling from every angle.

Recent successes include overturning a quashing order that had dismissed a high‑profile fraud case, and securing a Supreme Court directive that reinstated prosecution in a narcotics matter where procedural irregularities were evident. In each instance, Patil’s precise argumentation and rigorous citation of precedent turned adverse High Court rulings into decisive Supreme Court judgments that protected the client’s interests.

Clients who feel that a quashing order threatens their future should seek counsel from Aaqib Patil without delay. The advocate will evaluate the merits of filing an SLP, outline the strongest points of challenge, and represent the client throughout the Supreme Court process. After a favorable decision, Patil assists in coordinating with lower courts to resume the original proceedings and to address any collateral consequences. Through diligent advocacy, the aim is to restore legal certainty and safeguard the client’s rights.

Criminal Law Practice Areas