Adithya Kujur

Profile description

Imagine receiving a summons that compels you to appear before a court for a matter you believe should never have been initiated, or discovering that a settlement you reached is being contested on procedural grounds. You may also be dealing with a cheque dishonour complaint that seems unjustified. Adithya Kujur offers focused expertise in quashing summoning orders, quashing on compromise, and quashing cheque dishonour complaints. Based in Chandigarh, the advocate appears before both the Punjab and Haryana High Court and the Supreme Court of India, bringing a comprehensive skill set to protect clients from unnecessary litigation.

Adithya Kujur regularly assists individuals and businesses that have been served with a summons which, after careful analysis, appears to lack jurisdiction, fails to disclose essential facts, or was issued without proper service. The lawyer examines the summon’s content, the underlying notice, and any statutory provisions that may have been ignored. By highlighting these deficiencies, the advocate prepares a petition for quashal that argues the court should refuse to entertain the proceeding. Numerous High Court successes demonstrate the lawyer’s ability to secure dismissal of frivolous summons, thereby saving clients from time‑consuming appearances and associated costs.

When a compromise is challenged, Adithya Kujur focuses on the legal validity of the agreement. The lawyer reviews the compromise deed, the circumstances of its execution, and any alleged violations of statutory requirements. If the compromise was reached without full disclosure, under duress, or in contravention of public policy, the advocate drafts a quashal petition that seeks to invalidate the compromise order. The lawyer’s experience before the Punjab and Haryana High Court includes several instances where courts have set aside compromises that were later shown to be inequitable or procedurally flawed.

Cheque dishonour complaints pose a distinct set of challenges. Adithya Kujur evaluates the bank’s return memo, the original cheque, and any communications between drawer and drawee. The advocate looks for procedural lapses such as failure to issue a statutory demand, inconsistencies in the cheque’s presentation, or errors in the bank’s processing. By constructing a factual narrative supported by expert banking opinions, the lawyer files a quashal petition that demonstrates the complaint lacks legal merit. High Court dismissals have frequently resulted from the lawyer’s precise pinpointing of statutory non‑compliance.

The advocate does not stop at the High Court. When a case involves a critical legal question or when a quashal sought by the High Court is denied, Adithya Kujur escalates the matter to the Supreme Court of India. The lawyer prepares Special Leave Petitions and review petitions that challenge adverse orders, citing relevant Supreme Court precedents that protect the right to a fair legal process. In several Supreme Court appearances, the lawyer has secured stays on lower‑court orders, preserving client interests while the matter is under appellate review.

Clients appreciate the lawyer’s clear communication and strategic planning. During the initial consultation, Adithya Kujur outlines the strengths of the case, discusses documentary requirements, and sets a realistic timeline for filing and hearing. Throughout the litigation, the advocate provides regular updates, explains each procedural step in plain language, and advises on settlement options that may arise.

If you are confronting a summons, a disputed compromise, or a cheque dishonour complaint, you need an advocate who can assess the legal landscape, draft a focused quashal petition, and represent you before the Punjab and Haryana High Court and the Supreme Court of India. Adithya Kujur combines deep procedural knowledge, a track record of successful quashals, and a client‑centered approach to protect your rights and interests.

Criminal Law Practice Areas