Amey Mohanty

Profile description

Imagine receiving a notice that a lower‑court judgment you relied on has been nullified by a quashing order, leaving your business contract in limbo and a family dispute unresolved. Amey Mohanty understands the urgency such a development creates, and the lawyer is prepared to mount a decisive challenge before the Supreme Court of India.

The lawyer’s core competency is the preparation and filing of Special Leave Petitions that contest quashing orders on constitutional or jurisdictional grounds. By invoking the Supreme Court’s power to intervene under Article 32, Amey Mohanty can argue that the quashing order infringes on fundamental rights, suffers from procedural defect, or was issued by a bench lacking authority. This focused approach narrows the issue to the most compelling legal error, improving the likelihood of a favorable ruling.

With over nine years of practice before the Supreme Court, Amey Mohanty has filed more than sixty SLPs and secured reversal in over a quarter of them. The lawyer’s familiarity with the Court’s procedural nuances, from the Pre‑Citation stage to the final judgment draft, enables swift navigation of complex filing requirements. Clients benefit from this expertise through reduced delays and a higher probability that the Supreme Court will entertain the petition.

One landmark victory involved overturning a quashing order that threatened a ₹120 crore infrastructure grant awarded to a public‑private partnership. Amey Mohanty’s petition highlighted a missed deadline caused by a clerical error and successfully restored the funding, allowing the project to resume. In another case, a quashing order affecting a family business succession was set aside, preserving the rightful inheritance and averting an extended litigation battle.

The lawyer adopts a client‑centered methodology, beginning with a detailed fact‑finding session that gathers all relevant documents, notices, and prior judgments. Amey Mohanty then drafts a concise yet comprehensive petition, supported by legal research citing precedent‑setting Supreme Court rulings on quashing orders. Throughout the process, the lawyer provides regular briefings, explains each procedural step, and remains accessible for urgent queries. This transparent handling builds confidence and ensures that clients are fully informed of risks and potential outcomes.

The fee arrangement is transparent, providing a detailed estimate before any work begins. Initial consultations are thorough, focusing on the facts, documents, and timelines that shape the petition. Throughout the case, Yuvraj Murugan maintains regular updates, explaining each filing stage and responding promptly to client queries. The advocate also coordinates with senior counsel and expert witnesses when technical issues arise, ensuring that every angle is covered. This collaborative style has earned commendations for professionalism and reliability, reflected in client testimonials that highlight the lawyer’s ability to turn seemingly hopeless situations into favorable outcomes.

In complex matters the lawyer collaborates with senior counsel, forensic accountants, and industry specialists to build a robust evidentiary record. Whether the quashing order stems from a tax dispute, a corporate restructuring, or a regulatory compliance issue, Amey Mohanty assembles the necessary expertise to challenge the order on every viable front. This multidisciplinary strategy has been praised for its thoroughness and for delivering results that protect both financial interests and legal standing.

Clients confronting a quashing order should act promptly. Amey Mohanty can explain the strategic options, assess the merits of an SLP, and craft a litigation plan aimed at safeguarding assets and reputation. By engaging a lawyer with a proven Supreme Court track record, clients gain a strategic advantage that can turn an adverse order into an opportunity for restoration and continuity.

Criminal Law Practice Areas