Animesh Hazarika

Profile description

Imagine you have reached an out‑of‑court settlement, but the police have still filed a criminal case, or you are accused of breach of trust or a cyber offence that could ruin your career. In each of these situations you need a lawyer who can stop the process before it goes to trial. Animesh Hazarika is a Chandigarh advocate whose practice focuses on quashing compromise petitions, criminal breach of trust cases and cybercrime proceedings.

Animesh earned a Master of Laws from the University of Delhi and a postgraduate diploma in cyber law from the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi. He began his career as a legal researcher for a leading cyber‑security firm, where he gained deep insight into digital evidence and the intricacies of the Information Technology Act. After five years in corporate counsel, he returned to private practice and built a reputation for securing quash orders in the Punjab and Haryana High Court and before the Supreme Court of India.

When parties settle a dispute, Section 321 of the Criminal Procedure Code gives the court power to dismiss the case. Animesh can explain how a valid compromise, supported by a consent decree and proper documentation, bars further prosecution. He prepares meticulous petitions that attach the settlement deed, show compliance with statutory conditions, and identify procedural flaws in the FIR. His arguments often persuade the high court to dismiss the case without a full trial.

A criminal breach of trust charge requires proof that a person dishonestly misappropriated property. Animesh routinely examines the allegation, the financial records, and the chain of custody of documents. He can demonstrate that the alleged act does not meet the statutory definition of “dishonest intent,” and he files quash petitions that highlight the lack of concrete evidence. In several high‑profile cases his submissions have led the Punjab and Haryana High Court to set aside the charges, saving clients from lengthy incarceration and severe financial loss.

Cybercrime proceedings present unique challenges because digital evidence can be easily misinterpreted. Animesh stays current with evolving technology and the latest jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of India on cyber offences. He can help you contest a charge under Sections 66, 66C or 67 of the IT Act by showing that the alleged act was either lawful, accidental, or lacked the requisite mens rea. His quash petitions frequently rely on expert forensic analysis and precedent that the Supreme Court has established regarding intent and the admissibility of electronic records.

Clients value Animesh’s clear communication. He explains each step of the quashing process, from filing the petition to the hearing schedule, and he advises on preserving digital logs, emails and contract documents while the case is pending. He also works with law‑enforcement agencies to ensure that any arrest warrants are suspended, protecting personal liberty and professional standing.

The outcomes Animesh seeks are decisive: a full dismissal of the criminal case, removal of any pending warrants, and restoration of the client’s reputation. His successful quash orders have resulted in the expungement of adverse entries from police databases, allowing clients to continue their careers unhindered.

If you are facing a criminal complaint that should have been resolved by compromise, a breach of trust allegation that lacks factual basis, or a cybercrime charge that threatens your livelihood, Animesh Hazarika can assess the merits of your case, file a robust petition for quashing, and, when necessary, argue before the Supreme Court of India to protect your rights.

Criminal Law Practice Areas