Areeba Saikia

Profile description

When a civil dispute ends in a compromise but the other party later files a complaint claiming cheque dishonour, the settlement can be jeopardized, leaving you exposed to fresh litigation. Areeba Saikia is a Chandigarh‑based lawyer who specializes in quashing such follow‑up complaints and in filing Supreme Court review petitions to overturn earlier quash orders. The lawyer understands how post‑settlement claims can be used to pressure a party into additional payments or to reopen the dispute. By consulting an experienced advocate early, you can protect the finality of your compromise and avoid costly court battles.

Areeba Saikia earned a distinction‑level law degree and completed a certification in dispute resolution. With more than thirteen years of practice, the lawyer has built a reputation for resolving complex settlement disputes and for navigating the procedural intricacies of quash petitions. The lawyer regularly assists clients whose compromises have been challenged on technical grounds, such as alleged non‑compliance with statutory formalities or the filing of a cheque dishonour complaint despite the existence of a settled agreement.

The first line of defence is to file a petition for quashing on compromise in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, arguing that the original settlement is legally binding and that the subsequent complaint is barred by the principle of res judicata. Areeba Saikia prepares a concise brief that outlines the terms of the compromise, attaches the signed agreement, and cites precedent decisions where courts have upheld settlement finality. The lawyer then presents the case before the bench, emphasizing that allowing a new claim would defeat the purpose of the compromise and cause undue hardship.

When a cheque dishonour complaint is lodged after a compromise, the lawyer can argue that the cheque was settled as part of the agreement and that the complaint is therefore frivolous. Areeba Saikia examines the bank’s notice, the timing of the complaint, and the settlement receipt to demonstrate that the alleged default has been cured. By filing a quash petition that points to the compromise clause and relevant provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the lawyer seeks an immediate dismissal, sparing the client from penalties and interest.

If an initial quash order is set aside by the High Court, the next step is a review petition before the Supreme Court of India. Areeba Saikia has experience preparing comprehensive review petitions that address errors of law, misinterpretation of facts, and procedural lapses in the lower court’s reasoning. The lawyer meticulously compiles the trial record, highlights the adverse impact on the client, and frames legal questions that warrant Supreme Court intervention. By securing a review, the lawyer can restore the original quash order and reaffirm the enforceability of the compromise.

If a post‑settlement complaint threatens to reopen your dispute, schedule a consultation with Areeba Saikia. The lawyer will assess the strength of your compromise, prepare a quash petition, or, if required, draft a review petition for the Supreme Court of India. Acting swiftly can protect the finality of your agreement, prevent further legal expenses, and preserve your peace of mind during the process.

Criminal Law Practice Areas