Skip to directory
Advocate Chandigarhadvocatechandigarh.comQuashing Lawyers in Chandigarh High Court

An FIR or Criminal Proceeding to Challenge? Explore Quashing Lawyers in Chandigarh, Practice Areas and Client Reviews.

← Browse lawyers

Debayan Juneja

Profile description

Imagine the shock of finding an FIR lodged against you for alleged fraud, cheating, or a cheque that supposedly bounced. The immediate impact can be a frozen bank account, a damaged business reputation, and a looming criminal trial. Debayan Juneja steps in at that critical point, offering specialist expertise to challenge and quash such proceedings before they gain momentum. The advocate evaluates the underlying facts, the evidence collected by police, and the legal basis of each complaint to determine the most effective remedy in either the Punjab and Haryana High Court or the Supreme Court of India. The lawyer also checks for any violation of the right against self‑incrimination, ensuring procedural safeguards are observed.

Debayan Juneja regularly assists clients in filing petitions to quash FIRs that are premature, baseless, or filed without proper jurisdiction. The lawyer inspects the police report for procedural lapses, such as failure to record statements, lack of specific allegations, or violation of the right to counsel. By citing Supreme Court precedents where FIRs were dismissed for vagueness, the advocate prepares a petition that argues the case should not proceed to investigation. In recent matters, the lawyer secured interim orders that halted police interrogation, prevented asset attachment, and preserved the client’s business operations. The petition typically seeks dismissal under Section 239 of the CrPC, emphasizing lack of specific allegations.

When a fraud or cheating case advances beyond the FIR stage, Debayan Juneja can move to quash the charge sheet itself. The lawyer identifies weaknesses such as absence of essential documents, reliance on illegal evidence, or misapplication of the Indian Penal Code sections. By presenting a concise argument before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, the advocate requests dismissal under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, highlighting that the prosecution has failed to meet the threshold of prima facie evidence. The advocate also prepares a detailed schedule of documents, which courts have praised for clarity. Successful quash petitions have saved clients from protracted trials and protected substantial financial interests.

In many commercial disputes, a single cheque bounce can trigger a criminal complaint that threatens credit lines and supplier relationships. Debayan Juneja can intervene by filing a petition to quash the cheque dishonour complaint when the alleged dishonour results from a technical error, a bona‑fide dispute, or a procedural defect in the banking notice. The lawyer drafts a petition that references the Negotiable Instruments Act, demonstrates that the requisite notice was not properly served, and provides bank statements that prove sufficient funds. Courts have frequently granted quash orders in such scenarios, allowing businesses to resume normal transactions without the stigma of a criminal case. The lawyer may also request that the bank be directed to release any held guarantees, thereby preventing further financial strain.

The advocate holds a master’s degree in law with a focus on criminal and commercial law, and has completed a distinguished clerkship in a Supreme Court chamber. Over fifteen years of practice, Debayan Juneja has appeared before both the Punjab and Haryana High Court and the Supreme Court of India in more than eighty quashing matters across FIRs, fraud cases, and cheque disputes. Clients appreciate the lawyer’s clear communication, the thorough preparation of supporting affidavits, and a strategic focus on preserving assets and reputation. The approach begins with a detailed review of all documents, followed by the preparation of a targeted petition that cites relevant statutes and case law. If a lower court’s decision is later contested, the advocate files a review petition in the Supreme Court, presenting fresh evidence and pinpointing legal errors. Throughout the process, the lawyer provides regular updates, explains the implications of each filing, and commits to achieving a decisive quash that restores the client’s peace of mind. Clients who retain this lawyer can expect a proactive defence strategy, rapid filing of motions, and unwavering advocacy to protect their business and personal interests.

Contact

Criminal Law Practice Areas

Client Reviews

0 reviews

No reviews yet.

Review submissions are currently closed.