Keerthana Dahiya

Profile description

Imagine a lower court has issued a quashing order that unexpectedly nullifies an ongoing litigation, leaving a business or individual without legal protection. Keerthana Dahiya steps in to challenge that order by filing a Review Petition before the Supreme Court of India, offering a second chance to overturn an adverse decision.

Keerthana Dahiya earned a Bachelor of Laws from the University of Delhi and a Master of Laws with a focus on constitutional and appellate practice. With sixteen years of experience, the advocate has handled a wide range of high‑profile matters before both the Punjab and Haryana High Court and the Supreme Court of India. Early work as a research associate for a senior judge honed analytical abilities, while later senior positions in leading chambers refined courtroom advocacy and strategic filing of review applications.

A Review Petition is a limited remedy that allows the Supreme Court to reconsider its own judgment when a material error or new evidence emerges. Keerthana Dahiya regularly assists clients in identifying grounds such as misappreciation of fact, procedural irregularities, or overlooked precedents that justify a review of a quashing order. The lawyer drafts precise petitions that cite relevant Supreme Court precedents, highlight the impact of the quashing order on the client’s rights, and argue why the Court should exercise its discretion to revisit the decision.

Before the Supreme Court of India, the advocate has secured several landmark reviews that reinstated previously quashed proceedings. In one notable case, the Court set aside a quashing order that had dismissed a shareholder dispute, ruling that the lower court had failed to consider essential documentary evidence. The subsequent reinstatement enabled the client to protect its equity stake and avoid irreversible loss. Another success involved a review that restored a criminal bail order after the Supreme Court recognized that the quashing decree had been issued without providing the accused an opportunity to be heard.

Clients appreciate the transparent and responsive style adopted by Keerthana Dahiya. The lawyer explains the realistic prospects of success, outlines the filing timeline, and clarifies any costs associated with preparing the review and potential oral arguments. Regular updates are provided through secure messaging, and the advocate coordinates with the client’s local counsel to ensure that all documentary requirements are met promptly.

The approach blends meticulous legal research with practical advocacy. Keerthana Dahiya works closely with senior counsel, forensic experts, and statutory analysts to assemble a comprehensive record that addresses both legal and factual dimensions of the case. The lawyer also prepares detailed briefing notes for any Supreme Court hearing, rehearses arguments, and anticipates questions from the bench, thereby increasing the likelihood of a favorable review.

Beyond the review stage, the advocate remains prepared to file curative petitions or seek additional relief if the Supreme Court’s order requires clarification. By maintaining close communication with the client and promptly acting on any interim directions, Keerthana Dahiya ensures that the client’s position is protected throughout the process. Clients who have engaged the lawyer report confidence in the handling of complex quashing matters and satisfaction with outcomes that have restored their legal standing at the highest judicial level.

Criminal Law Practice Areas