Mukta Sihag

Profile description

If a narcotics investigation has led to a criminal case that threatens your freedom and your family’s future, the prospect of a long‑term prison sentence under the NDPS Act can be terrifying. Mukta Sihag, a diligent advocate practicing in Chandigarh, dedicates her practice to quashing such proceedings before they advance to trial. By filing a focused petition in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, the lawyer aims to halt the process at the earliest possible stage, sparing the client from the harsh penalties prescribed by the law.

The NDPS Act permits the court to order a cognizance of offences only when the prosecution presents sufficient evidence of possession, consumption, or trafficking of narcotic substances. Mukta Sihag regularly assists clients in demonstrating that the investigation suffers from procedural flaws, such as illegal search, lack of proper seizure documentation, or failure to establish a direct link between the accused and the contraband. By preparing a detailed memorandum that cites relevant sections of the Act and recent Supreme Court judgments, the advocate seeks an order that dismisses the case on the basis of insufficient proof.

The Supreme Court of India has repeatedly emphasized that the protection of personal liberty outweighs the state’s interest when the evidential foundation is shaky. Mukta Sihag leverages those precedents to argue that the High Court must scrutinize the legality of the seizure and the chain‑of‑custody. When the court finds that the police failed to follow the mandatory procedures laid down in the NDPS Act, it is compelled to quash the proceeding, thereby preventing an unwarranted trial.

Over the past thirteen years, Mukta Sihag has achieved quashing orders in more than sixty NDPS matters before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, often within a few weeks of filing. In several landmark cases, the lawyer’s petitions were cited by the Supreme Court in broader rulings that clarified the standards for seizure and proof under the NDPS regime. Clients commend the advocate’s ability to translate complex statutory language into clear arguments that resonate with judges, leading to decisive dismissals that protect their future.

The lawyer’s process begins with a comprehensive review of the police report, the alleged drug quantities, and the forensic analysis. Mukta Sihag meets with the client promptly, explains the quashing procedure in plain language, and outlines a timeline for each filing stage. The advocate then drafts a precise petition, attaches supporting expert opinions on laboratory testing, and files it with the High Court accompanied by an affidavit stating the client’s clean record and community ties. Throughout the hearing, the lawyer presents a confident oral argument, counters opposing submissions, and highlights the lack of any criminal intent.

Beyond securing the quash, Mukta Sihag assists clients with the removal of any remaining restrictions, such as restoration of seized property and clearance of criminal records. The advocate collaborates with forensic laboratories to ensure that evidence is properly re‑examined, and works with local authorities to prevent future harassment. With a focus on protecting personal freedom and safeguarding reputation, the lawyer strives to deliver a definitive resolution that allows the client to return to normal life without the shadow of a narcotics charge.

Criminal Law Practice Areas