Myra Banerjee

Profile description

Imagine law enforcement has seized a large quantity of narcotics and filed a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, threatening severe imprisonment and asset seizure. The accusations can feel overwhelming, especially when the evidence appears to have been obtained without proper procedure or when the quantity involved is disputed. Myra Banerjee, a dedicated advocate authorized to practice before the Punjab and Haryana High Court and the Supreme Court of India, focuses on NDPS proceedings quashing, offering a lifeline to those facing draconian drug charges.

Myra Banerjee earned a top‑ranked LL.B. degree followed by a specialized diploma in narcotics law. Over the past thirteen years, they have served as a legal researcher for a state drug enforcement agency before moving to private practice, where the focus shifted to defending individuals accused under the NDPS Act. This unique blend of insider knowledge and courtroom experience enables Myra to anticipate the prosecution’s strategy, identify procedural lapses, and construct a robust defense that targets the very basis of the charge.

When an NDPS case is filed, the Punjab and Haryana High Court can examine whether the charge sheet complies with statutory safeguards, such as the requirement for a proper seizure report, accurate valuation of seized drugs, and lawful arrest procedures. Myra routinely files petitions under Section 482 to request quashing of the proceedings on grounds of illegal search, lack of credible evidence, or miscalculation of the drug quantity. By attaching forensic analysis, expert valuation reports, and citations of Supreme Court precedents that stress proportionality, Myra often secures an order dismissing the case before it proceeds to trial.

In complex NDPS cases where the High Court’s decision is contested, the matter can be escalated to the Supreme Court of India. Myra has drafted special leave petitions that argue the High Court erred in interpreting key provisions of the NDPS Act, especially those related to the presumption of possession and the mandatory minimum sentencing. By highlighting inconsistencies with Supreme Court jurisprudence on proportional punishment, Myra can persuade the apex court to set aside the lower‑court order, thereby granting an ultimate quash that nullifies all pending proceedings.

Clients who have engaged Myra Banerjee describe a clear turning point once a quash petition is filed. In several high‑profile cases, the advocate succeeded in having the entire NDPS case dismissed, which prevented asset confiscation and avoided lengthy imprisonment. In other instances, the Supreme Court intervened to overturn a High Court order that had imposed a mandatory minimum sentence, resulting in a reduced penalty and the restoration of the client’s livelihood. These outcomes not only safeguard personal freedom but also protect family stability and future professional prospects.

Myra Banerjee’s practice is built on transparent communication and meticulous preparation. The advocate begins with a detailed fact‑finding interview, explains the legal landscape, and outlines a step‑by‑step roadmap for filing the quash petition. Throughout the process, clients receive regular updates on the status of the High Court or Supreme Court proceedings, along with plain‑language summaries of any judicial observations. Fee structures are clear from the outset, and Myra’s commitment to ethical representation has earned a reputation for both effectiveness and integrity. If a narcotics charge threatens to upend your life, Myra Banerjee can evaluate the evidence, craft a precise petition, and pursue a court order that extinguishes the NDPS proceedings.

Criminal Law Practice Areas