Nandana Mahato

Profile description

Imagine a scenario where a lower‑court verdict that favored you is suddenly set aside by a quashing order, leaving your property or business rights in doubt. Nandana Mahato recognizes the urgency such a reversal creates and is prepared to mount a robust challenge before the Supreme Court of India.

The lawyer’s principal service is the drafting and filing of Special Leave Petitions that contest quashing orders on constitutional or jurisdictional flaws. By invoking Article 32, Nandana Mahato argues that the quashing order infringes on fundamental rights, was issued without proper authority, or suffers from a material procedural defect. This focused approach isolates the most persuasive legal error, increasing the probability that the Supreme Court will grant relief.

With thirteen years of Supreme Court practice, Nandana Mahato has presented over eighty SLPs, achieving reversal in more than one‑third of them. The lawyer’s deep familiarity with the Court’s procedural nuances—from the initial leave application to the final judgment drafting—allows for swift navigation of complex filing requirements. Clients benefit from reduced delays and a higher chance of a successful outcome.

A recent landmark achievement involved overturning a quashing order that threatened a multi‑crore infrastructure contract awarded to a private‑public partnership. Nandana Mahato highlighted a procedural irregularity in the lower court’s notice and secured a Supreme Court order that reinstated the original award, preserving the client’s revenue stream. In another case, a quashing order affecting a family’s property settlement was set aside, enabling the parties to proceed with their agreed division.

The lawyer follows a client‑centered process that begins with a thorough fact‑finding interview, during which all relevant documents, notices, and prior judgments are collected. Nandana Mahato then prepares a concise yet comprehensive petition, supported by precedent‑setting Supreme Court rulings on quashing orders. Throughout the litigation, the lawyer provides regular briefings, explains each procedural step, and remains accessible for urgent queries.

The fee arrangement is transparent, comprising a fixed filing fee and a performance‑linked component that aligns the lawyer’s interests with the client’s success. After the initial consultation, Nandana Mahato provides a detailed cost estimate, ensuring no hidden expenses. Satisfied clients repeatedly commend the lawyer’s diligence, noting how thorough preparation and persuasive advocacy transformed seemingly hopeless situations into decisive victories.

For particularly intricate matters the lawyer collaborates with senior counsel, forensic accountants, and industry experts to build a robust evidentiary record. Whether the quashing order stems from a tax dispute, a corporate restructuring, or a regulatory compliance issue, Nandana Mahato assembles the necessary expertise to challenge the order on every viable front. This multidisciplinary strategy has been praised for its thoroughness and for delivering results that protect both financial interests and legal standing.

Clients across industries—from manufacturing to technology startups—have relied on Nandana Mahato to defend their rights against unjust quashing. One technology entrepreneur praised the lawyer for swiftly exposing a factual misinterpretation that formed the basis of the quashing order, leading to a Supreme Court reversal that saved critical intellectual property assets. Such feedback underscores the lawyer’s ability to combine legal acumen with practical business insight.

Anyone confronting a quashing order should act without delay. Nandana Mahato can explain the strategic options, assess the merits of an SLP, and develop a litigation plan aimed at safeguarding assets and reputation. Engaging a lawyer with a proven Supreme Court track record offers the best chance to overturn an adverse order and restore legal certainty.

Criminal Law Practice Areas