Omkar Tandon

Profile description

When a lower court judgment orders a continued criminal trial that appears to overlook key legal errors, the immediate need is to approach the Supreme Court for a review and possible quash of the proceedings. Omkar Tandon provides expert assistance in filing review petitions that aim to overturn such decisions and protect the client’s rights.

Omkar Tandon focuses exclusively on Supreme Court review petitions in quashing cases. The advocate understands the stringent standards governing review under Article 137 of the Constitution and the procedural intricacies of the Supreme Court Rules. By highlighting jurisdictional flaws, misapplication of law, or lack of evidential basis, the lawyer crafts a petition that asks the apex court to set aside the impugned order.

With over fifteen years of practice, Omkar Tandon has appeared regularly before the Supreme Court of India. The lawyer has handled a wide range of criminal matters, from corruption investigations to economic offences, and has developed a reputation for meticulous research and persuasive oral submissions. The advocate’s deep familiarity with Supreme Court precedents enables swift identification of the strongest grounds for review.

Recent successes illustrate the advocate’s effectiveness. In a notable case involving a wrongful conviction for alleged financial fraud, the lawyer secured a review that resulted in the Supreme Court quashing the trial order on the basis of procedural irregularity, leading to the client’s immediate release. Another matter saw the advocate obtain a stay on a high‑profile bail revocation, preserving the client’s liberty while the substantive appeal proceeded.

Omkar Tandon earned an LLB with distinction from Panjab University and completed a Master of Laws specializing in Criminal Law at the National Law School of India University. The advocate has been awarded the ‘Outstanding Review Petitioner’ award by the Chandigarh Bar Association and frequently contributes articles on Supreme Court jurisprudence to leading legal journals.

The review petition process begins with a comprehensive audit of the original judgment. The lawyer gathers the record, identifies errors, and prepares a concise but powerful filing that complies with the Supreme Court’s format and timeline requirements. After filing, Omkar Tandon presents oral arguments, addressing any questions from the bench and reinforcing the request for quash with precedent‑driven reasoning.

Clients value the clear guidance provided throughout. The advocate explains the limited scope of a review, sets realistic expectations about hearing dates, and keeps the client informed of every development. Regular updates and strategic advice help the client understand the implications of each procedural step and prepare for potential outcomes.

Choosing Omkar Tandon means engaging a lawyer who combines extensive Supreme Court experience with a focused approach to quashing wrongful proceedings. The advocate’s proven track record offers confidence that a review petition can be effectively presented, increasing the likelihood of a favorable decision that restores freedom and reputation.

The lawyer also advises on post‑decision measures, such as filing appropriate applications for expungement of records and guiding the client through any compensation claims that may arise from wrongful prosecution. By maintaining a long‑term relationship, Omkar Tandon ensures that the client’s legal standing remains robust, reducing the likelihood of future disputes and safeguarding personal and professional reputation.

Criminal Law Practice Areas