Richa Dewangan

Profile description

A quashing order that terminates a criminal proceeding can leave you feeling stranded, especially when you believe the decision ignored vital evidence or misapplied the law. In such circumstances, filing a Special Leave Petition or a Review Petition in the Supreme Court of India may restore your ability to contest the charges. Richa Dewangan has dedicated her practice to these exact remedies and can help you navigate the appellate process.

Richa Dewangan has more than thirteen years of experience before the Supreme Court. The advocate graduated from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, before completing a law degree at the National Law University, Bangalore. After serving as a research associate for a senior Supreme Court lawyer, Richa Dewangan launched an independent practice that specializes in criminal reviews, particularly Special Leave Petitions against quashing orders and Supreme Court Review Petitions in quashing cases.

The first avenue is a Special Leave Petition (SLP), a discretionary remedy that permits the Supreme Court to hear an appeal even when a statutory right of appeal does not exist. Richa Dewangan regularly assists clients by identifying the precise legal defects in the lower court’s quash order—such as erroneous interpretation of statutory provisions, failure to consider material evidence, or procedural irregularities. The advocate then drafts a focused petition that frames these defects as compelling reasons for the Supreme Court to grant leave, supporting the argument with recent judgments that emphasize the court’s duty to correct miscarriages of justice.

When an SLP is not granted, or when new information surfaces after the Supreme Court’s initial decision, a Review Petition becomes the next recourse. This instrument allows a party to request the Supreme Court to revisit its own order on the basis of a manifest error or fresh evidence that could not have been presented earlier. Richa Dewangan has successfully filed Review Petitions that introduce new forensic analyses, previously unavailable witness testimonies, or highlight a glaring miscalculation in the application of law. By presenting a clear factual revision and citing fresh precedents, the lawyer enhances the likelihood that the bench will set aside the quashing order.

The advocate’s strategy is both methodical and client‑oriented. Initially, a comprehensive audit of the case file is performed to pinpoint every vulnerability in the quash order. A step‑by‑step timeline is then prepared, outlining the filing of the SLP, the preparation of a response to any opposition, and the potential transition to a Review Petition. Throughout the process, Richa Dewangan maintains transparent communication, explaining each procedural milestone in plain language and managing expectations about timelines and possible outcomes.

Clients commend the lawyer for demystifying the Supreme Court’s complex procedures. The advocate explains how the court assesses the merit of an SLP, the standards for granting a Review, and the importance of oral advocacy in reinforcing the written submissions. Successful cases have included the reversal of quash orders in cyber‑crime investigations, the restoration of trial rights in cases involving financial fraud, and the acceptance of new evidentiary material that dramatically altered the course of a prosecution.

If you suspect that a quashing order was issued on shaky grounds, a consultation with Richa Dewangan can determine whether an SLP or a Review Petition is the appropriate remedy. The advocate will evaluate the strengths of your case, outline the procedural roadmap, and, where viable, file the petition that seeks to overturn the adverse order. Prompt action can preserve your right to a fair trial and prevent an irreversible loss. Trust a seasoned Supreme Court lawyer to defend your interests at the highest level.

Criminal Law Practice Areas