An FIR or Criminal Proceeding to Challenge? Explore Quashing Lawyers in Chandigarh, Practice Areas and Client Reviews.
Sahana Shrivastava
Profile description
If you have been served a charge sheet that threatens criminal prosecution, the prospect of a drawn‑out trial can be daunting. Sahana Shrivastava, a seasoned advocate practicing in Chandigarh, specializes in quashing charge sheets, NDND (NDPS) proceedings, and criminal complaints before both the Punjab and Haryana High Court and the Supreme Court of India. By scrutinizing the legal foundations of each filing, the lawyer helps clients prevent unnecessary litigation and protects their right to a fair process.
Sahana Shrivastava earned a law degree from the University of Delhi and completed a Master’s in Criminal Law from the National Law University, Hyderabad. With more than thirteen years of courtroom experience, the advocate has built a reputation for meticulous analysis of prosecutorial documents and for crafting precise arguments that lead to the dismissal of unfounded charges. Regularly representing both individuals and corporate clients, the lawyer combines rigorous research with a pragmatic approach to courtroom advocacy before the High Court and the nation’s apex court.
The charge sheet is a formal document that outlines alleged offenses and triggers the trial process. Sahana Shrivastava reviews the charge sheet for procedural defects, such as lack of specific dates, absence of prima facie evidence, or violations of statutory filing timelines. The advocate files petitions seeking quashing on grounds that the prosecution has failed to meet the burden of proof at this early stage. By presenting alternate facts, highlighting investigative gaps, and citing relevant Supreme Court precedents, the lawyer can persuade the bench to dismiss the charge sheet, sparing the client from an exhaustive trial.
NDPS cases involve alleged violations of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, a statute that carries severe penalties. Sahana Shrivastava evaluates whether the investigation adhered to procedural safeguards, such as proper search warrants, accurate chain‑of‑custody for seized substances, and the presence of expert testimony. When deficiencies are identified, the advocate moves to quash the proceedings on the basis that the evidence is tainted or the prosecution’s case is insufficient. By invoking Supreme Court rulings that emphasize fair trial rights, the lawyer can secure dismissal of NDPS charges before the High Court, protecting the client’s liberty.
Criminal complaints lodged by police can initiate investigations that lead to arrest without prior notice. The advocate reviews the complaint for credibility, ensuring that the allegations are not frivolous or based on insufficient material. Sahana Shrivastava files applications for quashing when the complaint lacks substantive evidence, is motivated by personal vendetta, or fails to specify the legal provision violated. By demonstrating that the complaint does not satisfy the threshold for criminal proceeding, the lawyer can have it struck out at the early stage, saving the client from unnecessary detention and stigmatization.
Clients who have engaged Sahana Shrivastava report swift dismissals and substantial relief from stress and financial burden. Successful quashings have allowed clients to preserve their professional reputation, continue business operations, and avoid the stigma associated with criminal proceedings. The advocate maintains transparent communication, explains each filing’s strategic purpose, and provides realistic expectations regarding timelines and possible outcomes. This client‑centered approach has resulted in high satisfaction rates and repeat referrals from individuals and corporate entities alike.
The advocate’s ongoing commitment to legal scholarship ensures that every petition reflects the latest jurisprudence from the Supreme Court and recent High Court judgments. Sahana Shrivastava regularly participates in seminars on criminal procedure and maintains a network of forensic specialists to bolster evidentiary challenges. This proactive stance equips the lawyer to anticipate prosecutorial strategies and to craft compelling arguments that safeguard clients’ rights at every stage of the criminal process.
ContactCriminal Law Practice Areas
Client Reviews
No reviews yet.
Review submissions are currently closed.