Samar Kashyap

Profile description

A cybercrime allegation or a charge under the NDPS Act can feel like an immediate threat to your liberty and professional life. When the Punjab and Haryana High Court issues an order that could deprive you of your freedom or business, you need a lawyer who knows how to dismantle the basis of those proceedings. Samar Kashyap specializes in quashing cybercrime proceedings and NDPS cases, offering a focused defense strategy that targets procedural flaws and evidentiary gaps.

Samar Kashyap has spent more than twelve years honing expertise in high‑court criminal matters. After graduating from a top law institute, the advocate joined a boutique criminal practice that handled complex technology‑related offenses and drug‑related investigations. This foundation led to a deep familiarity with the investigative techniques used by law enforcement agencies and the statutory safeguards intended to protect individuals from overreach.

When a cybercrime case is opened, the first question is whether the alleged offense falls within the scope of the Information Technology Act or whether the evidence was obtained lawfully. Samar Kashyap regularly assists clients in scrutinizing digital forensics reports, examining the chain of custody, and challenging the admissibility of intercepted data. By filing a timely petition to quash the proceeding, the lawyer argues that the High Court should not permit a trial based on insufficient or improperly gathered evidence.

Similarly, NDPS proceedings often hinge on the characterization of substances, the credibility of seizure documentation, and the correctness of the procedural steps taken by police. Samar Kashyap can help you understand whether the substances involved truly meet the statutory definition of a narcotic or whether the seizure was conducted without a valid warrant. In many instances, the advocate has successfully highlighted procedural lapses—such as failure to record the exact quantity or to provide a lawful cause for the search—that led the High Court to dismiss the case entirely.

Clients appreciate the advocate’s methodical approach. Samar Kashyap begins every engagement with a comprehensive fact‑finding session, followed by a detailed audit of the charge sheet, forensic reports, and police records. The lawyer then prepares a concise petition that outlines the specific legal deficiencies and requests immediate quashing of the proceedings. Throughout, the advocate provides clear explanations of each step, demystifying the complexities of cyber and drug law.

The advocate’s track record includes several high‑profile quash orders. In one notable cybercrime case, a professional faced allegations of unauthorized data access that stemmed from a misinterpreted login log. Samar Kashyap’s petition exposed the lack of intent and the absence of a clear breach, prompting the High Court to set aside the proceeding. In another NDPS matter, an entrepreneur was accused of possessing a controlled substance based on a flawed field test. The advocate successfully demonstrated the unreliability of the test, leading to a dismissal that protected the client’s business reputation.

Beyond filing petitions, Samar Kashyap advises on preserving digital evidence, managing expert testimony, and coordinating with technical consultants to ensure that any forensic analysis presented in court is robust and reliable. The advocate’s network within the High Court enables swift filing of interim relief, such as stays on arrests or bail applications, while the quash petition is under consideration.

Choosing Samar Kashyap means aligning with a lawyer who combines technical acumen, meticulous legal analysis, and a relentless commitment to defending your rights against unwarranted cybercrime or NDPS actions. The advocate’s focus is on securing a decisive quash order that restores your freedom and protects your personal and professional integrity.

Criminal Law Practice Areas