Sarika Sangwan

Profile description

When a civil dispute is settled by compromise, yet one party later files a criminal complaint seeking to overturn that agreement, the resulting legal turmoil can jeopardize the settlement and create fresh anxieties.

Sarika Sangwan appears as a dedicated advocate in Chandigarh who specializes in quashing such proceedings before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, covering compromise‑related matters, matrimonial criminal case quashing, and cheque‑dishonour complaint quashing.

A compromise decree is intended to be final, but the law permits a criminal complaint to be lodged if a party alleges fraud or coercion. Sarika Sangwan regularly assists clients who have already reached a settlement and now face an unexpected criminal petition. The advocate scrutinizes the compromise terms, verifies that all conditions were fulfilled, and prepares a petition to the Punjab and Haryana High Court demonstrating that the criminal action is contradictory to the settled agreement. By emphasizing the legal principle that a valid compromise bars subsequent prosecution for the same issue, the lawyer seeks a quashing order that preserves the parties’ original intent.

In many matrimonial disputes, one spouse may resort to filing a criminal case as leverage during divorce or alimony negotiations. Sarika Sangwan can help individuals whose marriages have turned contentious by filing a petition to quash the criminal proceedings. The advocate assesses whether the allegations, such as cruelty, dowry harassment, or false accusations, lack substantive evidence or are being used merely as pressure tactics. By presenting detailed evidence, witness statements, and relevant case law, the lawyer argues that the High Court should dismiss the criminal case, allowing the family matter to be resolved through civil channels.

Cheque‑dishonour complaints often arise from commercial or personal transactions that later become disputed. When a creditor files a criminal complaint for a bounced cheque that the debtor believes was justified, Sarika Sangwan can intervene to protect the debtor’s rights. The advocate examines the facts surrounding the cheque, including any settlement, mutual releases, or procedural lapses in the filing of the criminal complaint. By filing a petition for quashing, the lawyer seeks to demonstrate that the criminal case is an escalation of a civil debt issue that should be resolved through negotiation rather than prosecution.

Sarika Sangwan brings over twelve years of litigation experience to each petition. A graduate of a respected law college in Chandigarh, the advocate began a career in the district courts before focusing on High Court practice. Over the years, the lawyer has argued numerous quashing petitions across the three specialised areas, gaining recognition for clarity of argument and swift procedural navigation. The practice is built on detailed document review, strategic use of precedents, and constant client communication, ensuring that each case proceeds with a clear roadmap.

Clients repeatedly report relief when a quashing order is secured, avoiding the stress of prolonged criminal litigation and protecting their financial and personal interests. Sarika Sangwan’s familiarity with the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s procedural expectations enables the filing of well‑supported petitions that meet the court’s standards, increasing the likelihood of favourable orders. The advocate also guides clients on post‑quash steps, such as enforcing settlement terms or addressing any remaining civil obligations. With a balanced blend of legal rigor and empathy, the lawyer aims to restore peace of mind and protect the rights of those confronting unexpected criminal actions.

Criminal Law Practice Areas