Antipatory Bail in Indian Penal Code (IPC) : Section 376AB : Rape committed by a person in a position of trust or authority towards the victim – in Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

Overview of Section 376AB: Aggravated Sexual Assault under IPC

Section 376AB of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) pertains to the offense of aggravated sexual assault, and is a specific provision aimed at addressing particularly heinous instances of rape. This section was introduced through the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act of 2018, reflecting an urgent need to address grave sexual crimes against women, especially minors. Section 376AB is applicable in cases where the victim is a woman under twelve years of age.

Under this provision, the essence of the offense lies in the perpetrator committing rape with a minor below the stipulated age, and such an offense carries a minimum punishment of rigorous imprisonment for twenty years, which may extend to imprisonment for life. The term ‘imprisonment for life’ in this context effectively means imprisonment for the remainder of the person’s natural life. Moreover, the statute also provides for the death penalty in cases where the sexual assault leads to death of the victim or leaves her in a persistent vegetative state.

The introduction of Section 376AB into the IPC was a direct response to the growing outcry against child sexual abuse in India. The severity of the punishment reflects the legislative intent to act as a deterrent against such offenses. The law also necessitates stringent measures during the investigation and trial phase to ensure fairness and justice. Additionally, due to the particularly vulnerable status of the victims involved, Section 376AB cases are required to be fast-tracked through the judicial process, ensuring a time-bound trial.

  • Aggravated Sexual Assault on a minor under 12 years of age
  • Minimum punishment of 20 years’ rigorous imprisonment
  • Possibility of life imprisonment or the death penalty
  • Fast-tracked proceedings through the judicial system

In practice, the application of Section 376AB requires meticulous adherence to legal procedures to ensure that the rights of both the accused and the victim are preserved. Furthermore, considering the psychological impact on the survivors of such heinous crimes, the court also provides protection to maintain their anonymity and offers support through the trial process. With the inclusion of this section in the IPC, the focus has been laid on delivering swift and exemplary punishment to instill fear against committing such atrocities and to provide solace and justice to the victims of aggravated sexual assault.

The Concept and Legal Provisions of Anticipatory Bail

Anticipatory bail refers to a legal remedy available in the Indian legal system, allowing individuals to seek bail in anticipation of an arrest on the accusation of having committed a non-bailable offense. Defined under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, anticipatory bail is granted by a High Court or a Sessions Court, providing a person with a safeguard from being detained if he or she fears an arrest on the grounds of a false or concocted charge.

When a person anticipates that there is a move to get him/her arrested on false or trumped up charges, or due to enmity with someone, or he has reason to believe that he may be falsely implicated in a case where he may be arrested, he has the right to move the court of Sessions or the High Court under Section 438 for grant of bail in the event of such an arrest. Essentially, the provision of anticipatory bail enshrines the principle that every person is presumed innocent until proven guilty, allowing individuals to protect their fundamental right to liberty against baseless charges.

“When any person has reason to believe that he may be arrested on an accusation of having committed a non-bailable offence, he may apply to the High court or the Court of Sessions for a direction under this section; and that Court may, if it thinks fit, direct that in the event of such arrest, he shall be released on bail.” – Extract from Section 438 of CrPC.

The criteria for the grant of anticipatory bail are broadly similar to those applicable to regular bail. However, the court granting anticipatory bail must consider a few key factors such as:

  • The severity of the crime
  • The likelihood of the accused fleeing from justice
  • The possibility that the accused may tamper with the witness or evidence
  • The criminal antecedents of the applicant

Since anticipatory bail is a matter of discretion for the courts, it is not granted as a matter of right. The applicant must demonstrate that he or she has reasons to believe that they may be implicated in a false case, motivating them to seek such protection. Moreover, the court may impose certain conditions while granting anticipatory bail, such as:

  • Restriction on leaving the country without permission
  • Directing the individual to make themselves available for interrogation
  • Preventing direct or indirect communication with potential witnesses

Anticipatory bail, once granted, continues until the end of the trial unless specifically curtailed by the court. The provision for anticipatory bail is indicative of the legal system’s commitment to uphold an individual’s personal liberty and to ensure that the process of justice is not weaponized for personal vendetta.

Judicial Interpretations by Punjab and Haryana High Court on Anticipatory Bail in Section 376AB Cases

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has had the occasion to interpret the provisions relating to anticipatory bail in the context of Section 376AB of the IPC through several judicial pronouncements. Given the gravity of the offense and the stringent penalties associated with it, the High Court has approached such cases with a higher degree of scrutiny than might apply in other matters. The Court has been consistently diligent in balancing the rights of the accused with the societal interest in safeguarding children from sexual offenses.

From the various judgments that have emerged, the approach taken by the High Court involves examining the severity of the allegations and the role of the accused with great care. Issues related to the credibility of the allegations, the strength of the evidence, and the conduct of the accused are thoroughly evaluated before deciding on the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail. Additionally, the High Court has emphasized the importance of protecting the identity and rights of the minor victims while assessing the bail application.

  • The likelihood of the applicant influencing or intimidating witnesses, especially given that the victims are minors and particularly vulnerable.
  • The potential threat to the life or well-being of the victim if the accused were to be released on bail.
  • Previous conduct and criminal background of the accused which could inform the decision of the court.
  • The need for thorough and uninterrupted investigation, which could be compromised if the accused were granted relief.

The High Court has also acknowledged the societal impact of crimes under Section 376AB, recognizing that such heinous acts not only traumatize the victim but also send shockwaves through the social fabric. Therefore, the discretion to grant anticipatory bail is applied with caution, reflecting the serious nature of the offense and its repercussions.

In some instances, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has opted to deny anticipatory bail, underlining that the protection against arrest should not be used as a shield by individuals accused of committing grave offenses against vulnerable victims. In doing so, the Court has reiterated that the liberty of an individual accused cannot be looked at in isolation but must be juxtaposed against the larger context of public order, the heinousness of the crime, and the justice due to the victim.

It is pertinent to note that in dealing with anticipatory bail applications under Section 376AB, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has shown a propensity to prioritize the procedural integrity of the criminal justice system as well as the administration of justice. Throughout these deliberations, the Court has continued to reaffirm the underlying principle that the freedom of the accused must sometimes yield to the imperative of the criminal justice system to operate unimpeded, particularly in cases involving the sexual assault of children.


List of Most Recommended Lawyers:


1. Advocate Nisha Singh
  • Experience: more than 20 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

2. Advocate Yuvraj Bhatia
  • Experience: more than 25 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

3. Advocate Krish Mehra
  • Experience: more than 35 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

4. Advocate Arnav Mehra
  • Experience: more than 40 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

5. Advocate Reyansh Reddy
  • Experience: more than 30 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

6. Advocate Diya Verma
  • Experience: more than 50 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

7. Advocate Zoya Khanna
  • Experience: more than 30 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

8. Advocate Aryan Chopra
  • Experience: more than 25 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

9. Advocate Aarush Mehra
  • Experience: more than 20 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

10. Advocate Aarav Saxena
  • Experience: more than 45 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer