Regular Bail in Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) : Section 20 : Punishment for storage of pornographic material involving children – in Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

Overview of Section 20 of POCSO Act: Storage of Pornographic Material Involving Children

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, a comprehensive law in India aimed at protecting children from sexual abuse and exploitation, specifically includes provisions meant to address the creation, possession, and dissemination of child pornographic material. According to Section 20 of the POCSO Act, anyone who stores or possesses pornographic material involving a child, with or without the intent to disseminate it, can be held liable under the law.

This section is pivotal in the context of digital and electronic material, where storage could be facilitated through various forms including but not limited to computer hard drives, removable storage devices, smartphones, and cloud storage services. The gravity of this offence is reflected in the stringent punishment prescribed under the Act, which may include imprisonment, fines, or both.

  • Intent to distribute is considered an aggravating factor, where the law ensures harsher penalties for those storing such material with the intention of sharing or selling it.
  • The nature and volume of the pornographic content held, as well as the presence of any previous offenses by the individual in question, can influence the severity of the punishment.
  • Section 20 is also significant as it creates a non-bailable offence, setting a high bar for the accused to be granted bail.
  • Furthermore, it includes provisions for the protection of the child’s identity involved in such materials.

The enforcement of this law requires meticulous investigation and evidence-gathering, often necessitating coordination between different law enforcement agencies and sometimes international cooperation, since storage and dissemination of such material can easily cross borders in this digital age.

In essence, Section 20 of the POCSO Act makes it abundantly clear that not only the creation and active distribution but also the passive possession of pornographic materials involving children is a serious criminal offence, reflecting society’s growing concern over the safety and dignity of children in the face of new challenges posed by the digital revolution.

Criteria for Granting Regular Bail under POCSO in Punjab and Haryana High Court

The criteria for granting regular bail under the POCSO Act, particularly in the judiciary of Punjab and Haryana High Courts, are stringently applied due to the sensitive nature of crimes involving children. Under POCSO, the presumption is typically against bail, especially in serious offences such as those covered by Section 20. When deliberating on bail applications, the High Courts take into account a multitude of factors, ensuring that each case is assessed on individual merit while keeping the legislative intent of the Act at the forefront.

  • The severity of the offence – Considering the stringent punishments laid out in POCSO for storage of child pornography, the severity of the offence is a significant factor in determining bail. The courts evaluate whether the nature and extent of the material stored pose a grave threat to the welfare of children.
  • Risk of tampering with evidence – An assessment is made regarding the risk the accused poses to the integrity of evidence, including potential influence over witnesses or the victim’s family.
  • The character and antecedents of the accused – The past conduct and criminal history of the accused are scrutinized to gauge the likelihood of reoffending or absconding from the law.
  • The potential for influencing the trial – The possibility of the accused manipulating the course of the trial from outside custody is considered, to ensure justice for the victim.
  • The age and health of the accused – While POCSO prioritizes the protection of children, the court may also consider the personal circumstances of the accused including age, health, and family responsibilities.
  • Length of the judicial process – If the trial is expected to take an extended amount of time, this could influence the decision on whether continued detention of the accused is justified.
  • Flight risk – Evaluating the likelihood of the accused fleeing the legal process is a critical component in bail considerations.

Moreover, the general principle of ‘bail over jail’ is counterbalanced by the societal interest in safeguarding children against sexual offences. As a result, every effort is made to protect the identity of the minor involved and prevent any further trauma that could arise from the accused being granted bail.

It must be noted that the granting of bail under this Act is not the norm but an exception, and an intensive judicial examination is undertaken to ascertain that the rights of the accused do not override the paramount necessity of protecting child victims from sexual exploitation and abuse.

Thus, the Punjab and Haryana High Courts adhere to stringent standards when considering bail applications under the POCSO Act, weighing the potential risks against the rights of the accused, whilst always prioritizing the best interest and welfare of the children involved.

Legal Precedents and Judgments in Punjab and Haryana High Court for POCSO Section 20 Cases

The jurisprudence of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in cases related to Section 20 of the POCSO Act showcases a firm stance towards offenses involving the storage of pornographic materials with children as subjects. Legal precedents set by this court serve as guiding principles not just for prosecutors and defense attorneys, but also for lower courts deliberating on similar matters within the jurisdiction.

One notable judgment came in the form of a detailed ruling which emphasized that the presence of a large quantity of such pornographic material could imply a commercial angle, thereby attracting harsher sentences. This verdict set a precedent for the future, suggesting that the quantum of material in possession can indicate the severity and intent of the crime.

In another significant judgment, the court underscored the irrevocable harm and continuing distress that victims of child pornography experience whenever such material is disseminated. Thus, ensuring the non-proliferation of such material was deemed paramount. The court held that stringent conditions must be imposed on an accused who is granted bail to mitigate any possible risk of them disseminating or creating more illegal content.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has also clarified the need to balance the interests of justice with the rights of the accused. For instance, a judgment pronounced that solitary confinement of the accused before trial should not be a means for punishment, but the courts stressed that such consideration does not minimize the gravity of the offence or the necessity of a trial for due process.

  • Judgmental nuances
  • The High Court also outlined judgmental nuances, incorporating the broader objectives of the POCSO Act, such as the imperative need to maintain confidentiality regarding the identity of the child involved, even if the accused is granted bail. This seeks to uphold and respect the privacy and dignity of the victim, a key concern embedded within the Act.

  • Conditions upon release
  • Another aspect often highlighted in such judgments is the imposition of stringent conditions upon the release of the accused on bail. These conditions typically include the avoidance of contact with the victim or any potential witnesses and a directive to not tamper with the evidence. Such conditions aim to protect the integrity of the ongoing legal process.

  • Technological aspects
  • Recognizing the evolving nature of digital crimes, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has also taken into account the technological aspects when delivering judgments. Decisions have included discussions around the technicalities of storage and retrieval of data, the role of internet service providers, and the handling of electronic evidence, underscoring the courts’ adaptation to digital-era challenges.

  • Guiding principles for lower courts
  • Judgments from the High Court serve as guidance for lower courts while dealing with POCSO related offenses, ensuring a harmonious and standard interpretation of the law across the state judiciary system. These precedents and principles become critical in carving a clear legal pathway for handling such delicate cases.

With these and other detailed rulings, the legal landscape surrounding Section 20 of the POCSO act continues to be shaped in the Punjab and Haryana High Courts. Each judgment not only addresses the immediate case at hand but also constructs a broader legal framework aimed at combatting the exploitation of children and upholding the sanctity of their rights.


List of Most Recommended Lawyers:


1. Advocate Priya Desai
  • Experience: more than 20 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

2. Advocate Sanaya Malhotra
  • Experience: more than 25 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

3. Advocate Krish Mehra
  • Experience: more than 35 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

4. Advocate Kabir Gupta
  • Experience: more than 40 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

5. Advocate Aisha Bhatia
  • Experience: more than 30 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

6. Advocate Prisha Saxena
  • Experience: more than 50 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

7. Advocate Rehaan Patel
  • Experience: more than 30 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

8. Advocate Avisha Gupta
  • Experience: more than 25 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

9. Advocate Atharva Jain
  • Experience: more than 20 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer

10. Advocate Aanya Mehra
  • Experience: more than 45 years
  • Expertise: Quashing matters
  • Practice Area: Criminal Lawyer